Yes, but even the most esoteric of basic science studies has the potential for a great payoff, whereas knowing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin is unlikely to advance mankind much.
Yes, but even the most esoteric of basic science studies has the potential for a great payoff, whereas knowing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin is unlikely to advance mankind much.
Course, if the research showed that there is not a shred of evidence that there is any such thing as Angels, hence none could dance on a pin, I think mankind would advance very much indeed.
If you remove Islam and substitute Christianity, I submit that those insane suicide bombers would be equally willing to do it for Jesus as they are to do it for Allah.
Jim Knollenberg
During the Crusades, it was indeed happening on both sides.
Right. Have you seen the MIT Archive of Useless Research?
I’m certainly not arguing that all or even most basic science research is or ever will be valuable. What I am saying is that in amongst all the trash is an occasional breakthrough that will ultimately be of great benefit to mankind. Of course, it’s impossible to know up front which is which, so we have a lot of tolerance. (Unlike, say, the Church had with Galileo.)